ᱨᱮᱫ:Detailed SVG map of the Hispanophone world.svg

ᱟᱥᱚᱞ ᱨᱮᱫ(SVG ᱨᱮᱫ, ᱱᱚᱨᱢᱟᱞᱛᱮ ᱕᱑᱒ x ᱒᱖᱐ pixels, ᱨᱮᱫ ᱡᱟᱜᱟ: ᱖᱔᱕ KB)

ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱫᱚ ᱱᱚᱸᱰᱮ ᱠᱷᱚᱱ Wikimedia Commons ᱟᱨ ᱯᱟᱥᱮᱡ ᱮᱴᱟᱜ-ᱟ ᱯᱚᱨᱡᱮᱠᱴ ᱨᱮᱦᱚᱸ ᱵᱮᱵᱦᱟᱨᱚᱜ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ᱾ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱨᱮᱭᱟ ᱯᱟᱥᱱᱟᱣ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱯᱟᱥᱱᱟᱣ ᱥᱟᱦᱴᱟ ᱞᱟᱛᱟᱨᱨᱮ ᱮᱢ ᱮᱱᱟ᱾


ᱢᱩᱬᱩᱛ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ

ᱵᱤᱵᱚᱨᱚᱱᱤ
English:
 
Official language
 
Co-official language
 
Minority language (more than 20% Spanish speakers)
Español:
 
Idioma oficial
 
Idioma cooficial
 
Idioma minoritario (hablado por más del 20% de la población)
ᱢᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ
ᱯᱷᱮᱰᱟᱛ
ᱚᱱᱚᱞᱤᱭᱟᱹ Jpthefish
Other versions

ᱞᱟᱭᱥᱮᱱᱥ ᱛᱮᱭᱟᱨ

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
ᱟᱴᱨᱤᱵᱩᱥᱚᱱ ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧ ᱱᱚᱝᱠᱟ ᱜᱮ
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
ᱟᱲᱟᱜ ᱜᱮᱭᱟᱢ:
  • ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧᱢᱮ – ᱱᱚᱠᱚᱞ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ, ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧ ᱟᱨ ᱵᱷᱮᱡᱟᱭᱢᱮ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ
  • ᱢᱮᱥᱟᱣᱠᱟᱛᱢᱮ – ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱟᱞᱜᱟᱭ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱫ
ᱞᱟᱛᱟᱨ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱨᱤᱛ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ:
  • ᱟᱴᱨᱤᱵᱩᱥᱚᱱ – ᱟᱢ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱥᱚᱫᱚᱨ ᱦᱩᱭᱟᱢᱟ ᱡᱚᱠᱷᱚᱱ ᱚᱱᱚᱞᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱟᱨᱵᱟᱝ ᱞᱟᱭᱥᱮᱸᱥᱩᱭᱟᱹ ᱫᱟᱨᱟᱭᱛᱮ ᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ ᱨᱟᱠᱟᱵ ᱠᱷᱟᱱ (ᱢᱮᱱᱠᱷᱟᱱ ᱟᱠᱚ ᱩᱫᱩᱜᱟᱜ ᱦᱚᱨ ᱛᱮᱫᱚ ᱵᱟᱝ ᱡᱟᱦᱟᱸ ᱟᱠᱚᱠᱚ ᱜᱚᱲᱚᱣᱟᱢ ᱟᱨᱵᱟᱝ ᱟᱢᱟᱜ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨ)
  • ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧ ᱱᱚᱝᱠᱟ ᱜᱮ – ᱟᱢ ᱡᱩᱫᱤ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱵᱚᱫᱚᱞ, ᱛᱚᱨᱡᱚᱢᱟ, ᱵᱟᱝᱠᱷᱟᱱ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱪᱮᱛᱟᱱᱨᱮ ᱱᱟᱣᱟ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱥᱤᱨᱡᱟᱹᱣᱮᱢ ᱛᱮᱭᱟᱨ ᱠᱷᱟᱱ, ᱛᱚᱵᱮ ᱟᱢ ᱫᱚ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱠᱟᱹᱢᱤ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱞᱟᱤᱥᱮᱱᱥ ᱥᱮ ᱚᱱᱟ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱱᱟᱜ ᱞᱟᱤᱥᱮᱱᱥ ᱨᱮᱜᱮ ᱪᱟᱞ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜ ᱛᱟᱢᱟ᱾

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents
Map of the countries of the world where Spanish is widely spoken

Items portrayed in this file

ᱞᱟ.ᱭᱟᱭ

creator ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

some value

author name string ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ: Jpthefish
Wikimedia username ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ: Jpthefish

copyright status ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

copyrighted ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

copyright license ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

inception ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

᱖ ᱢᱮ 2020

MIME type ᱟᱝᱜᱽᱨᱮᱡᱤ

image/svg+xml

ᱨᱮᱫ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ

ᱚᱠᱛᱚ ᱨᱮ ᱞᱤᱱ ᱢᱮ/ᱚᱠᱛᱚ ᱨᱮ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱧᱮᱞ ᱞᱟᱹᱜᱤᱛ ᱞᱤᱱ ᱢᱮ

(ᱱᱟᱣᱟᱱᱟᱜ | ᱢᱟᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ) ᱧᱮᱞᱢᱮ (ᱱᱟᱣᱟᱱᱟᱜ ᱑᱐ | ) (᱑᱐ | ᱒᱐ | ᱕᱐ | ᱑᱐᱐ | ᱒᱕᱐ | ᱕᱐᱐)
ᱢᱟᱹᱦᱤᱛ/ᱚᱠᱛᱚᱴᱤᱯᱡᱚᱠᱷᱟᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱤᱭᱟᱹᱠᱟᱛᱷᱟ
ᱱᱤᱛᱚᱜ᱑᱗:᱕᱘, ᱑᱙ ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱒᱔᱑᱗:᱕᱘, ᱑᱙ ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱒᱔ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱕᱑᱒ × ᱒᱖᱐ (᱖᱔᱕ KB)MoalliRecent Aruban census data showing less than 20% Spanish speakers is not neutral? This is literally fitting the map's legend
᱐᱓:᱒᱖, ᱑᱖ ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱒᱔᱐᱓:᱒᱖, ᱑᱖ ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱒᱔ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱕᱑᱒ × ᱒᱖᱐ (᱘᱙᱓ KB)SalvablReverted to version as of 01:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC) There is no consensus to remove Aruba. If we were to do this because there are less than 20% Spanish speakers, Mauritania should also be removed from the map of the French language; otherwise there would be a lack of neutrality. The appropriate thing to do in these cases where the language is sufficiently relevant even if it does not reach 20% of speakers is to mark the country with a dot.
᱑᱕:᱑᱗, ᱑᱑ ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱒᱔᱑᱕:᱑᱗, ᱑᱑ ᱡᱟᱱᱩᱣᱟᱨᱤ ᱒᱐᱒᱔ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱕᱑᱒ × ᱒᱖᱐ (᱖᱔᱕ KB)MoalliRmv Aruba, most recent census data shows less than 20% Spanish speakers
᱐᱑:᱓᱕, ᱒᱗ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓᱐᱑:᱓᱕, ᱒᱗ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱕᱑᱒ × ᱒᱖᱐ (᱘᱙᱓ KB)Kwamikagamithere is no consensus to make an exception for the Philippines in the first place
᱑᱖:᱔᱕, ᱒᱔ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓᱑᱖:᱔᱕, ᱒᱔ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱕᱑᱒ × ᱒᱖᱐ (᱘᱙᱑ KB)SalvablReverted to version as of 21:29, 18 December 2023 (UTC) There is not sufficient consensus to gray the Philippines entirely.
᱐᱒:᱕᱗, ᱒᱔ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓᱐᱒:᱕᱗, ᱒᱔ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱕᱑᱒ × ᱒᱖᱐ (᱘᱙᱓ KB)Kwamikagamirv to status-quo ante: Spanish is no more important in the Philippines than French is in Vietnam. The number of speakers is miniscule.
᱒᱑:᱒᱙, ᱑᱘ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓᱒᱑:᱒᱙, ᱑᱘ ᱰᱤᱥᱮᱢᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱕᱑᱒ × ᱒᱖᱐ (᱘᱙᱑ KB)SalvablReverted to version as of 00:39, 9 October 2023 (UTC) That extremely tiny dot violates WP:ACCESSIBILITY. In addition, it was added unilaterally without prior consensus.
᱐᱖:᱑᱒, ᱑᱑ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓᱐᱖:᱑᱒, ᱑᱑ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱒,᱕᱓᱒ × ᱑,᱒᱘᱔ (᱘᱔᱑ KB)MoalliDon't unilaterally highlight PH as it has been agreed upon that shading the entire country is misleading and that the current dot is a placeholder until other possible color schemes (if any) are agreed upon. The situation is similar to Czech Rep on German maps regarding cultural presence vs Louisiana on French map (where it's official to some degree).
᱐᱐:᱓᱙, ᱙ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓᱐᱐:᱓᱙, ᱙ ᱚᱠᱴᱚᱵᱚᱨ ᱒᱐᱒᱓ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱕᱑᱒ × ᱒᱖᱐ (᱘᱙᱑ KB)SalvablReverted to version as of 13:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC) On world language maps where there is a cultural presence, the entire territory is usually highlighted (as for example Louisiana or New Hampshire on the French language-related maps). Nevertheless, I think there may be other options (such as the use of dots) that would help the map gain accuracy, but this requires discussion, and reaching a common consensus, which does not exist in this case. The solution is not just to turn gray the entir...
᱐᱕:᱒᱗, ᱑᱘ ᱚᱜᱚᱥᱴ ᱒᱐᱒᱓᱐᱕:᱒᱗, ᱑᱘ ᱚᱜᱚᱥᱴ ᱒᱐᱒᱓ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱛᱷᱚᱢᱵᱽᱱᱮᱞ ᱵᱷᱚᱨᱥᱚᱱ᱒,᱕᱓᱒ × ᱑,᱒᱘᱔ (᱘᱔᱑ KB)MoalliOn world language maps where there is a cultural presence/influential minority, the standard has been to place a dot or square on the concerned country, usually on the largest city or capital. Highlighting it entirely when it's not used in administrative settings or as the secondary language is blatant misrepresentation and POV-esque. Please see discussion on proposals to accurately map PH, but do not highlight the whole country, as that is not accurate.
(ᱱᱟᱣᱟᱱᱟᱜ | ᱢᱟᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ) ᱧᱮᱞᱢᱮ (ᱱᱟᱣᱟᱱᱟᱜ ᱑᱐ | ) (᱑᱐ | ᱒᱐ | ᱕᱐ | ᱑᱐᱐ | ᱒᱕᱐ | ᱕᱐᱐)

ᱞᱟᱛᱟᱨ ᱨᱮᱭᱟᱜ ᱥᱟᱦᱴᱟ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱲᱠᱚ ᱱᱤᱭᱟᱹ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱨᱮ:

ᱡᱮᱜᱮᱛ ᱡᱟᱠᱟᱛ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱟᱜ

ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱨᱮᱫᱠᱚ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨᱟᱠᱟᱫ ᱣᱤᱠᱤᱠᱚ :

ᱱᱚᱶᱟ ᱨᱮᱫ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱵᱟᱹᱲᱛᱤ ᱡᱮᱜᱮᱛ ᱵᱮᱵᱷᱟᱨ ᱧᱮᱞ ᱢᱮ ᱾

ᱢᱮᱴᱟ ᱥᱟᱹᱠᱷᱭᱟᱹᱛ