ᱪᱤᱱᱟᱼᱛᱤᱵᱵᱚᱛᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱜᱷᱟᱨᱚᱸᱡᱽ
ᱪᱤᱱᱟᱼᱛᱤᱵᱵᱚᱛᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱜᱷᱟᱨᱚᱸᱡᱽ ᱫᱚ ᱢᱤᱫ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱜᱷᱟᱨᱚᱸᱡᱽ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ, ᱡᱟᱦᱟ ᱨᱮ ᱔᱐᱐ ᱜᱟᱱ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱢᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱟᱠᱟᱫᱟ ᱾ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱠᱚ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱫᱚ ᱥᱟᱢᱟᱝ ᱮᱥᱤᱭᱟ, ᱥᱟᱢᱟᱝᱼᱠᱚᱧᱮ ᱮᱥᱤᱭᱟ ᱟᱨ ᱠᱚᱧᱮ ᱮᱥᱤᱭᱟ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱟᱫᱚᱢ ᱴᱚᱴᱷᱟ ᱠᱚᱨᱮ ᱵᱮᱵᱦᱟᱨᱚᱜ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱾ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱨᱚᱲᱼᱮᱫ ᱠᱟᱱ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱞᱮᱠᱟᱛᱮ ᱤᱱᱫᱳ-ᱤᱣᱨᱳᱯᱤᱭᱟᱱ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱜᱷᱟᱨᱚᱸᱡᱽ ᱛᱟᱭᱚᱢ ᱜᱮ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱴᱷᱟᱶ ᱾ ᱱᱚᱣᱟ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱜᱷᱟᱨᱚᱸᱡᱽ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱢᱟᱨᱟᱝ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱠᱚ ᱦᱩᱭᱩᱜ ᱠᱟᱱᱟ ᱪᱟᱭᱱᱤᱡᱽ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱑.᱓ ᱵᱤᱞᱤᱭᱚᱱ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱟᱨ ᱵᱚᱨᱢᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱓᱓ ᱢᱤᱞᱤᱭᱚᱱ ᱦᱚᱲ ᱮᱢᱟᱱ ᱾
| ᱪᱤᱱᱟᱼᱛᱤᱵᱵᱚᱛᱤ | |
|---|---|
| Trans-Himalayan | |
| ᱚᱛᱱᱚᱜ ᱪᱷᱮᱨ | ᱠᱚᱧᱮ ᱮᱥᱤᱭᱟ, ᱥᱟᱢᱟᱝ ᱮᱥᱤᱭᱟ, ᱮᱛᱚᱢ ᱮᱥᱤᱭᱟ, ᱥᱟᱢᱟᱝᱼᱠᱚᱧᱮ ᱮᱥᱤᱭᱟ |
| ᱯᱟᱹᱱᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧ | ᱡᱮᱜᱮᱛ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱢᱩᱬᱩᱛ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱜᱷᱟᱨᱚᱸᱡᱽ ᱠᱚ |
| ᱯᱨᱳᱴᱳᱼᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ | ᱯᱨᱳᱴᱳ ᱪᱤᱱᱟᱼᱛᱤᱵᱵᱚᱛᱤ |
| ᱪᱟᱸᱜᱟ ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧ | Some 40 well-established subgroups, of which those with the most speakers are: |
| ᱟᱭᱮᱥᱳ ᱖᱓᱙ᱼ᱒ / ᱕ | sit |
| ᱞᱤᱝᱜᱩᱣᱟᱥᱯᱷᱮᱭᱟᱨ | 79- (phylozone) |
| ᱜᱞᱚᱴᱴᱚᱞᱚᱜᱽ | sino1245 |
 ᱪᱤᱱᱟ-ᱛᱤᱵᱵᱚᱛᱤ ᱯᱟᱹᱨᱥᱤ ᱜᱷᱟᱨᱚᱸᱡᱽ ᱨᱮᱱᱟᱜ ᱢᱩᱬᱩᱛ ᱪᱟᱸᱜᱟ ᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱝ
| |
ᱱᱟᱜᱟᱢ
ᱥᱟᱯᱲᱟᱣᱯᱟᱥᱱᱟᱣ
ᱥᱟᱯᱲᱟᱣᱦᱟᱹᱴᱤᱧ
ᱥᱟᱯᱲᱟᱣᱵᱟᱨᱦᱮ ᱡᱚᱱᱚᱲ
ᱥᱟᱯᱲᱟᱣ- James Matisoff, "Tibeto-Burman languages and their subgrouping"
- Sino-Tibetan Branches Project (STBP)
- Behind the Sino-Tibetan Database of Lexical Cognates: Introductory remarks
- Sinotibetan Lexical Homology Database
- Guillaume Jacques, "The Genetic Position of Chinese"
- Marc Miyake (2014), "Why Sino-Tibetan reconstruction is not like Indo-European reconstruction (yet)"
- Andrew Hsiu (2018), "Linking the Sino-Tibetan fallen leaves"